Hark & Hark - A Partnership of Professional Corporations
HomeFirm OverviewAttorney ProfilesCriminal Defense OverviewNewsletterLegal NewsResource LinksContact Us

Criminal Defense

Main Office

1818 Market Street
30th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103
215-665-0766
215-665-1225 fax

King of Prussia

Valley Forge Towers
Suite 107
2000 Valley Forge Circle
King of Prussia, PA 19406
877-4-harklaw
877-442-7552

New Jersey Office

1101 Route 70 West
Suite 100
Cherry Hill, NJ 08002
1-800-888-8296
856-354-0440 fax

Recent Cases
Stop Searching. Start Calling. - Criminal Law / DUI  Hotline - 1-877-4-HARK-LAW - 24-Hour Answering Service - MasterCard VISA

Legal News

News

Crime

[12/31] Man who aided bicycle theft plan has bike stolen
[12/31] Man tries to fool cops by calling 911 during stop
[12/31] 2 men, 15-year-old girl charged with NYC murders
[12/31] Convict wants retrial in plot to kill US soldiers
[12/31] Reno man pleads not guilty to killing student, 19

More...

Case Summaries

Criminal Law & Procedure

[12/31] US v. House
Defendant's sentence of 188 months for distribution of crack cocaine is affirmed where the district court: 1) properly adjusted base offense level due to defendant's obstruction of justice in asking defense witness not to testify; 2) did not abuse its discretion in declining to reduce sentence based on the disparity in the sentencing guidelines for powder cocaine versus crack cocaine; and 3) properly considered all the requisite factors under sentencing law.

[12/31] US v. Hill
Conviction for bank robbery is affirmed where the district court committed harmless error in admitting evidence that defendant bought a luxury car shortly after the bank robbery. Defendant's challenge to the impartiality of his jury is also rejected because the court's method of questioning potential jurors was sufficient to assure that any prejudice would have been discovered and, in any event, defendant had failed to use all his peremptory challenges.

[12/31] Corcoran v. Buss
District court's grant of death row inmate's habeas petition is reversed because prosecutor's offer to forego seeking the death penalty if defendant would agree to a bench trial did not penalize defendant for exercising his constitutional right to a jury trial. State supreme court properly examined and rejected defendant's claim that he was incompetent to waive post-conviction proceedings.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

Philadelphia Office

Easily Reached by SEPTA

215-665-0766

Cherry Hill Office

1-877-442-7552

1-800-888-8296

King of Prussia Office

1-877-442-7552

610-431-0133

Print this PageEmail this Page