Jump to Navigation
Preserve Your Liberty, Choose Your Best Defense.

Our Recent Cases

Case Summaries

Criminal Law & Procedure

[12/14] Blakely v. Wards
A prisoner's motion for reconsideration of a denial of his attempt to proceed in forma pauperis, claiming that his prior actions dismissed as "frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim" cannot count as strikes under section 1915(g) because the dismissals occurred at summary judgment, is denied where: 1) the fact that an action was dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim, and not the case's procedural posture at dismissal, determines whether the dismissal constitutes a strike under section 1915(g); and 2) petitioner has had more than three prior cases dismissed expressly as frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim.

[12/14] US v. Carpio-Leon
A Mexican citizen's conviction for possessing firearms while being illegally or unlawfully in the United States is affirmed where: 1) the scope of the Second Amendment does not extend to provide protection to illegal aliens, because illegal aliens are not law-abiding members of the political community and aliens who have entered the United States unlawfully have no more rights under the Second Amendment than do aliens outside of the United States seeking admittance; and 2) defendant's Fifth Amendment challenge fails because prohibiting illegal aliens, as a class, from possessing firearms is rationally related to Congress's legitimate interest in public safety.

[12/14] US v. Powers
Defendant's convictions for conspiracy to defraud the United States by impeding the functions of the Internal Revenue Service and mail fraud is affirmed where: 1) district court properly refused to give advice-of-counsel instruction where this defense is not available to one who omits to disclose material information to advisors or dictates imprudent outcomes to advisors; and 2) defendants' claim that various witnesses were allowed to testify as to the ultimate issues, invading the role of the jury, is without merit.

[12/14] US v. Burgos
Defendant's conviction for conspiring to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute marijuana is reversed and remanded for an acquittal where the government did not meet its burden of proof with respect to the second element of the charged conspiracy.

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

  • Blog : Accomplice Liability in Pennsylvania

    The recent case of Commonwealth v Toritto, provides a good chance to review ACCOMPLICE LIABILITY IN PENNSYLVANIA. In this case, Toritto was charged with conspiracy based on tangential evidence of involvement in a drug deal. The Commonwealth argued his liability was based upon either conspiracy or accomplice liability.  The jury found him not guilty of […]View My Blog

number of philadelphia
criminal cases
filed in 2013

Our Office Locations

Main Office
1835 Market Street, Suite 2626
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone: 215-665-0766
Toll Free: 877-442-7552
Fax: 215-665-1225
Map and Directions

King of Prussia
Valley Forge Towers
Suite 107
2000 Valley Forge Circle
King of Prussia, PA 19406
Phone: 877-4-harklaw
(877-442-7552)

New Jersey Office
1101 Route 70 West
Cherry Hill, NJ 08002
Phone: 856-354-0050
Toll Free: 866-427-4552
Fax: 856-454-0440
Map and Directions