Samrat Mukherjee, a paramedic, admitted to posing as a physician and fabricating credentials, including a fake medical degree and residency match letter.  He then called in prescriptions to pharmacies for himself and others. Using the identities of two physicians, for their licensing numbers, he claimed to have the authority to write prescriptions. He caused the pharmacies to submit claims for reimbursement to Medicaid, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana and other insurers. By falsely representing himself as a medical doctor, he was also given physician access privileges at several hospitals, where he spent time seeing patients in the intensive care unit and other areas.  https://www.justice.gov/usao-mdla/pr/baton-rouge-man-falsely-holding-himself-medical-doctor-pleads-guilty-false-statements

I represent  pharmacist who submitted fake prescriptions through his retail pharmacy computers, wherein he forged numerous physicians’ prescriptive authority to submit the appropriate paperwork for the computer system to release the prescriptions to him.  He was feeding his opioid addiction. He was not, but could have been, charged with violating  http://18 U.S. Code § 1028A – Aggravated identity theft as he submitted over 1000 prescriptions for over 13000 pills.  Aggravated identity theft is a charge for which every count to which you either plead guilty or are found guilt must be served consecutively, not concurrently to any other sentence imposed.  The statutory language is:

no term of imprisonment imposed on a person under this section shall run concurrently with any other term of imprisonment imposed on the person under any other provision of law, including any term of imprisonment imposed for the felony during which the means of identification was transferred, possessed, or used;
(3)
in determining any term of imprisonment to be imposed for the felony during which the means of identification was transferred, possessed, or used, a court shall not in any way reduce the term to be imposed for such crime so as to compensate for, or otherwise take into account, any separate term of imprisonment imposed or to be imposed for a violation of this section; and
(4)
a term of imprisonment imposed on a person for a violation of this section may, in the discretion of the court, run concurrently, in whole or in part, only with another term of imprisonment that is imposed by the court at the same time on that person for an additional violation of this section, provided that such discretion shall be exercised in accordance with any applicable guidelines and policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to section 994 of title 28.

Call me to discuss your criminal case.