Other states’ legalization of marijuana has had a huge impact on Pennsylvania residents. Pennsylvania has not taken any steps to legalize possession or personal use of marijuana. Neighboring state’s legalization and lax federal enforcement has resulted in Pennsylvaniauthorities engaging in a heightened enforcement atmosphere, not relaxed one.For example, recently a suburban Philadelphia doctor and his daughter were charged possession with intent to deliver marijuana (“PWID”) after discovering that they were growing marijuana in their house. They were caught after the doctor began selling his home-grown marijuana to his patients. While marijuana may serve some medicinal purposes, easing or slowing the progression of glaucoma, Pennsylvania has yet to allow medical marijuana. As such, a Pennsylvania doctor’s possession, selling and illegal prescribing pot to his patients for a suggested medical purpose is illegal.The number of plants possessed in the house is also a big issue. Twenty eight marijuana plants were seized from the doctor’s home along with cash and contraband. These illegal plants in a personal residence being used for criminal purposes subjects the doctor’s Haverford Township home subject to forfeiture. The house was being utilized to engage in a criminal enterprise.Whether you agree or disagree with the slow legalization of pot in Pennsylvania, it currently is, and always will be, a crime to sell pot if you are not a properly licensed entity. Eventually, there will be a significant regulatory scheme in place to in Pennsylvania to buy and possess personal use cannabis. Look to California, Arizona, and Colorado for examples. As such, a doctor will never be allowed to grow his own pot and sell it to his patients for his prescribed medical treatment.On the DUI front, the Arizona Supreme Court recently rejected a marijuana DUI prosecution. In that matter, an individual was charged with driving under the influence of marijuana because traces of THC remained in his bloodstream several days after he legally smoked marijuana. A blood test revealed the presence in his blood the cannabis metabolite carboxy – THC. However, this chemical does not cause an impairment. As such, absent an impairment, the Arizona State Supreme Court ruled the individual was not “incapable of safe driving”. This called the “impairment” rule — a person must be actually impaired to be guilty of the DUI offense. The charges were dismissed.Pennsylvania does not follow this rule. Pennsylvania is a “per se” violation state. Pennsylvania law only requires the mere presence of the cannabis metabolite in a Pennsylvaniautomobile operator’s blood during motor vehicle operation for a violation of 75 Pa C.S.A. §3802(d) to be found. This rule does not matter if the operator of the car is a resident of another state. If you drive on Pennsylvania’s roads, you are subject to Pennsylvania law. Obviously, the car must be legally stopped or investigated for another motor vehicle violation, and the THC is discovered, before a guilty verdict may be found. The same mere presence law applies to all Pennsylvania professional license cases and health care work place rule violation cases.New Jersey and Arizona follow an impairment statute which requires an expert to testify that any illegal substances in the blood rendered the person “impaired” and not able to operate a motor vehicle safely. Pennsylvania requires the government to only present a drug report showing the presence of the drug. As such, in Pennsylvania person could be found guilty of DUI if they legally use medicinal or recreational marijuana outside of Pennsylvania but is stopped in Pennsylvania for some motor vehicle violation and the stop results in a blood draw due to suspicion of DAI or DUI.>The Pennsylvania licensing boards will follow Pennsylvania criminal statutes regarding possession and use of marijuana laws in Pennsylvania, not other jurisdictions. The lack of impairment will be irrelevant for any Pennsylvania licensing board investigation of illegal drug use or possession. Please call to discuss your case.>
States’ Legalization of Pot and How Pennsylvania’s refusal to Legalize Pot Effects You
On Behalf of Hark and Hark | Apr 26, 2014 | Firm News |
Categories
- Blog (36)
- Criminal Defense (46)
- Drug Crimes (30)
- Dui (20)
- Federal Crimes (13)
- Firm News (306)
- Injuries (6)
- Medical Nursing (56)
- Pennsylvania Criminal Law (34)
- Philadelphia Criminal Justice Updates (13)
- Professional License Application (37)
- Professional License Issues (162)
- Professional Misconduct (1)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Uncategorized (2)
- USMLE and ECFMG (3)
Archives
- June 2023 (1)
- May 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (3)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (2)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (3)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (4)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (5)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (2)
- March 2022 (3)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (2)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (2)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (3)
- June 2021 (3)
- May 2021 (3)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (3)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (4)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (3)
- September 2020 (8)
- July 2020 (3)
- June 2020 (5)
- May 2020 (2)
- April 2020 (8)
- March 2020 (9)
- February 2020 (7)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (8)
- November 2019 (5)
- October 2019 (6)
- September 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (3)
- May 2019 (5)
- April 2019 (6)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (5)
- January 2019 (7)
- December 2018 (10)
- November 2018 (8)
- October 2018 (7)
- September 2018 (5)
- August 2018 (6)
- July 2018 (3)
- June 2018 (8)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (5)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (4)
- July 2017 (3)
- June 2017 (6)
- May 2017 (2)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (2)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (5)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (5)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
- March 2016 (3)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (2)
- November 2015 (3)
- October 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (3)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (3)
- June 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (1)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (2)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (2)
- June 2014 (5)
- May 2014 (3)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (1)
- January 2014 (2)
- December 2013 (3)
- November 2013 (5)
- October 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (3)
- June 2013 (3)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (1)
- January 2013 (1)
- December 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (7)
- September 2012 (2)
- August 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (3)
- January 2012 (2)
- September 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (2)
- February 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (3)
- November 2010 (2)
- October 2010 (1)
- September 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (3)