In this “highly sensitive” climate of state license investigations, almost any professional work place complaint can become the basis for a license disciplinary action. It is the manner in which the licensee responds to the first contact from either work, the Board, or a criminal investigator that determines how the investigation will proceed.As I have blogged numerous times, do not cooperate with any first request for drug testing. Absent chemical proof of illegal narcotics ingestion, any job action (termination) is based upon workplace policy and not evidence.Thereafter, retain counsel to begin preparing for a possible probable cause petition requiring a Mental and Physical evaluation. This blog will discuss this part of the process.The probable cause petition is a confidential stage in the per-disciplinary proceedings. It is not a disciplinary action. It is the prosecutor’s confidential application to the probable cause screening committee of the license board. They present “your set of facts,” asking the committee to compel an evaluation by the Board’s expert.The licensee only finds out about the petition after the order permitting the evaluation is signed. The purpose is to confidentially ascertain whether the licensee is impaired or unable to practice their profession safely. The full Board does not learn of this action if the expert determines there is no impairment or safety concern. Your case is closed with a “no action” letter.It is in this stage in the process that counsel is very important. Remember, the first stage is dealing with an investigator. This second stage is preparing to meet with the prosecutor’s expert who determines whether an drug or medical impairment exists. Here, counsel’s preparation and attendance at the evaluation significantly improves your performance and probably leads to a “no action” letter.What is your set of facts? I have read factual allegations ranging from merely falling asleep in the 7P-7A shift, with nothing else, to criminal allegations of drug diversion, money theft, and multiple drunk driving offenses. The majority of my recent cases involve very specious suggestions of alcohol or drug use with no chemical evidence. Anecdotes include an employer securing a positive reading on a portable breath tests (PBT) due to mouth wash. Suggestions of improper drug wasting procedures with no positive drug test are rampant. Absent proof of drug use, the expert will rely on the actual evaluation and a medical records review.Significantly, the time delay after the initial job incident creates an advantage for the licensee. In this heightened reporting environment, front line investigators are overworked with very high case loads. Prosecutors’ case loads preclude them from emergently filing petitions. Delays are routine.It is in this time period that baseless suspicions of drug use can be countered and put to rest. Retaining counsel is the first course of action. Bi-monthly drug tests and accumulation of medical records and license qualifications are the next steps. Preparation for the pending mental and physical evaluation is the priority. An effective performance at the evaluation is the most important.How well you prepare for and present yourself at the evaluation will determine how your case will conclude. A recent hearing officer’s report described a professional unable to directly answer the expert’s questions, appearing to be high, and failing to accurately and adequately set forth her medical history to counter suggestions or inferences of long term prescription drug abuse. Attending the evaluation pro se (without an attorney), she was unprepared and not expecting the trap into which she was cast. A lengthy suspension was ordered.Properly preparing for the Mental and Physical exam is not just securing all medical records and documentation of care. It is ensuring you have counsel to properly present to the expert you and your case. Developing a theory of you and your case to effectively explain the work place incident or medical care is paramount. Ultimately, failure to effectively communicate your story will sabotage your career and endanger your license.Please call me to discuss the application for a Mental and Physical evaluation that arrived in the mail.
The Mental and Physical Evaluation
On Behalf of Hark and Hark | Apr 20, 2014 | Firm News |
Categories
- Blog (36)
- Criminal Defense (48)
- Drug Crimes (31)
- Dui (20)
- Federal Crimes (13)
- Firm News (306)
- Injuries (6)
- Medical Nursing (61)
- Pennsylvania Criminal Law (34)
- Philadelphia Criminal Justice Updates (13)
- Professional License Application (37)
- Professional License Issues (197)
- Professional Misconduct (11)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Uncategorized (2)
- USMLE and ECFMG (3)
Archives
- November 2024 (4)
- October 2024 (4)
- September 2024 (1)
- August 2024 (3)
- July 2024 (3)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (3)
- April 2024 (4)
- March 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (3)
- January 2024 (2)
- December 2023 (3)
- November 2023 (3)
- October 2023 (4)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (2)
- July 2023 (3)
- June 2023 (3)
- May 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (3)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (2)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (3)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (4)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (5)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (2)
- March 2022 (3)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (2)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (2)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (3)
- June 2021 (3)
- May 2021 (3)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (3)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (4)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (3)
- September 2020 (8)
- July 2020 (3)
- June 2020 (5)
- May 2020 (2)
- April 2020 (8)
- March 2020 (9)
- February 2020 (7)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (8)
- November 2019 (5)
- October 2019 (6)
- September 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (3)
- May 2019 (5)
- April 2019 (6)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (5)
- January 2019 (7)
- December 2018 (10)
- November 2018 (8)
- October 2018 (7)
- September 2018 (5)
- August 2018 (6)
- July 2018 (3)
- June 2018 (8)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (5)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (4)
- July 2017 (3)
- June 2017 (6)
- May 2017 (2)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (2)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (5)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (5)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
- March 2016 (3)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (2)
- November 2015 (3)
- October 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (3)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (3)
- June 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (1)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (2)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (2)
- June 2014 (5)
- May 2014 (3)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (1)
- January 2014 (2)
- December 2013 (3)
- November 2013 (5)
- October 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (3)
- June 2013 (3)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (1)
- January 2013 (1)
- December 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (7)
- September 2012 (2)
- August 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (3)
- January 2012 (2)
- September 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (2)
- February 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (3)
- November 2010 (2)
- October 2010 (1)
- September 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (3)