California is about to pass a law allowing random mandatory drug and alcohol tests for all physicians regardless of an employment or other event triggering reason. While Pennsylvania’s regulatory scheme is not yet this aggressive, DEA, federal OSHA, and Pennsylvania’s hospital reporting regulations already require event-based drug testing with confidential reporting and immunity for the reporting entity. Requiring doctors to now submit to random drug test, regardless of employment or professional setting, would be one more step in protecting medical consumers.The significant difference between state random drug tests of doctors, rather than DEA- federal, is the vigilance with which Pennsylvania’s medical licensing board will investigate its recreational drug using physicians. Currently any medical practitioner that seeks emergency or other medical care, during which an illegal or non-prescribed scheduled narcotic is found in their blood, will be reported to the Board if the practitioner does not self-report. This will trigger a Board license investigation.Random drug testing seeks to find the impaired physician rather than those physicians getting so bad that the impairment becomes obviously seen through criminal actions or poor behavior. The importance of random drug tests is that they would reveal those physicians utilizing recreational drugs but functioning in a professional manner. The Pennsylvania Medical Board will be equally hard on any type of drug using physician.California’s step towards adopting this investigative tool is based upon the western states’ legalization of marijuana for personal use. Doctors are now legally getting high. Unfortunately, the impairment presented by social recreational use of marijuana continues after the day of usage. Regulators are confronting professionals high on the job, rendering significant and serious medical decisions, but not necessarily showing signs of impairment. Absent the random testing, a criminal investigation, or acute medical treatment, investigators and regulators will now be able to learn of a physician’s inappropriate recreation use illegal drugs. This for consumer protection.California’s choice to do random drug tests indicates that it is going to be a per se violation state rather th an impairment state. By this I mean that regardless of whether the physician is impaired by the recreational drug of choice, the mere presence of that illegal substance in their blood will render them in violation of the regulatory scheme. This currently the rule in Pennsylvania with regard to our driving under the influence laws. Conversely, New Jersey is an impairment state, requiring the state to prove the illegal substance caused “impairment” at the time at the time of investigation. California is seeking to not have to prove the impairment, just the use of illegal drugs.Pennsylvania’s current medical regulatory scheme authorizes investigation and drug testing for suspicions of impairment as a result of anonymous tips or workplace events. California’s doctors are just now being brought into the modern age of regulatory investigation and consumer protection. The policy issue is do you want your doctor to be under the influence of an illegal substance while he/she is medically treating you or your family members. While there probably is a current similar scheme regarding suspicions of impairment, now California, and eventually the rest of the states, will use random testing to avoid the necessity of a have reasonable suspicion of an impairment to trigger testing.All other the drug testing provision would still be enforced through the existing regulatory provisions. Alleged violations would be reported to the California Medical Board. As stated above, another provisions requiring hospitals to report the name of doctor suspected of abusing drugs or alcohol is also present, Pennsylvanialready enforces this regulatory requirement regardless of whether the impairment is a prescription or illegal drug abuse.Please call me to discuss your medical license investigatory issues initiated by the Pennsylvania Medical Board as a result of your recreational or social use of illegal substances that do not affect your professional abilities.
Mandatory Drug Testing of Doctors Will Be Here
On Behalf of Hark and Hark | Aug 6, 2014 | Firm News |
Categories
- Blog (37)
- Criminal Defense (48)
- Drug Crimes (31)
- Dui (20)
- Federal Crimes (13)
- Firm News (308)
- Injuries (6)
- Medical Nursing (62)
- Pennsylvania Criminal Law (34)
- Philadelphia Criminal Justice Updates (13)
- Professional License Application (37)
- Professional License Issues (200)
- Professional Misconduct (13)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Uncategorized (2)
- USMLE and ECFMG (3)
Archives
- January 2025 (6)
- December 2024 (2)
- November 2024 (4)
- October 2024 (4)
- September 2024 (1)
- August 2024 (3)
- July 2024 (3)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (3)
- April 2024 (4)
- March 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (3)
- January 2024 (2)
- December 2023 (3)
- November 2023 (3)
- October 2023 (4)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (2)
- July 2023 (3)
- June 2023 (3)
- May 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (3)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (2)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (3)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (4)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (5)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (2)
- March 2022 (3)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (2)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (2)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (3)
- June 2021 (3)
- May 2021 (3)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (3)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (4)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (3)
- September 2020 (8)
- July 2020 (3)
- June 2020 (5)
- May 2020 (2)
- April 2020 (8)
- March 2020 (9)
- February 2020 (7)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (8)
- November 2019 (5)
- October 2019 (6)
- September 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (3)
- May 2019 (5)
- April 2019 (6)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (5)
- January 2019 (7)
- December 2018 (10)
- November 2018 (8)
- October 2018 (7)
- September 2018 (5)
- August 2018 (6)
- July 2018 (3)
- June 2018 (8)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (5)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (4)
- July 2017 (3)
- June 2017 (6)
- May 2017 (2)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (2)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (5)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (5)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
- March 2016 (3)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (2)
- November 2015 (3)
- October 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (3)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (3)
- June 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (1)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (2)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (2)
- June 2014 (5)
- May 2014 (3)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (1)
- January 2014 (2)
- December 2013 (3)
- November 2013 (5)
- October 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (3)
- June 2013 (3)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (1)
- January 2013 (1)
- December 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (7)
- September 2012 (2)
- August 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (3)
- January 2012 (2)
- September 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (2)
- February 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (3)
- November 2010 (2)
- October 2010 (1)
- September 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (3)