Social mediand the advent of voluntary public display of everything is starting to affect Pennsylvania’s professional licensing board investigations. For the last ten years I have consistently represented client’s under investigation for drug diversion and theft. These cases typically stem from hospital and nursing home based investigations. A new twist in the investigatory practices of these cases has emerged.
It is important to realize how state board investigators are now utilizing social medias an investigatory tool. Voluntary picture posts on Facebook, Instagram, or other websites will are now used as the professional’s own statements. Facial recognition software identifies and attaches names to various people in most photographs. Aspiring and licensed professionals should pause when choosing which if any photographs to post or in which they are included that others are posting. This should give you the professional great concern.
Pennsylvania’s Department of Attorney General, Bureau of Narcotics Investigations (BNI) and licensing board investigators have begun to search social media for names, addresses, the identity of complaining witnesses, and/or information to aide their criminal and licensing prosecutions. Investigators are learning — through a target’s own social media self-promotion — the target’s social activities, accomplices, associates, friends, and favorites hang outs. Many witnesses that would otherwise never be found are located, interviewed, and intimidated.
As well, during a client’s recent Nursing Board Mental and Physical Evaluation, the western Pennsylvania based psychiatrist asked my nurse client of her social media participation. This psychiatrist revealed he had searched Facebook, Instagram, and other social media outlets in preparation for the psychiatric drug impairment evaluation. The doctor sought evidence to confirm and corroborate my client’s statements during her evaluation about her social activities and drinking tendencies. The psychiatrist sought photographic and statement evidence which could reveal my professional client’s evaluation statements may have been inconsistent with social mediand/or statements is medical records to her doctors.
Credibility is the most important piece of evidence in an independent medical examination and at a licensing application or disciplinary hearing. The witnesses I present at a licensing hearing (live, via telephone, or in a letter) corroborate and strengthen my professional client’s reputation, character, and credibility.
Photographs of social celebration in the context of disciplinary hearings based upon accusations of drunk driving or drug and alcohol impairments constitute important cross-examination evidence. When a professional voluntarily hands to a psychiatrists, criminal or licensing board investigators evidence against them (or life style pictures that may poorly depict that licensee) it makes my defense harder and the prosecutor or psychiatrists impairment investigation easier. DO NOT DO THIS TO YOURSELF.
