VRP – Letter of Concern – What It Really Means
Licensees call me asking what is the VRP “Letter of Concern.” “Do I have to do all these things the packet asks me to do?” Do I have to answer these questions. This blog is a refresher of two prior blogs I wrote: VRP Letter of Concern and What is VRP Cooperation. Let’s go through the first four items the Letter of Concern packet asks of each licensee.
1) Contact Livengrin (or your local) drug and alcohol treatment center for an assessment.
2) Complete the Participation Cooperation Form and Personal Data Sheet;
3) Sign releases;
4) If you successfully complete the VRP evaluation and you do not meet the criteria for a mental and physical valuation, the VRP will close its file but will still notify the Department of State legal divisions of the findings.
1) The PNAP VRP Assessment Process
The assessment is a basic DSM-V, alcohol or drug abuse, questionnaire. Assessors almost always find criminal interaction (DUI, drug possession, or theft) or work place impact (getting fired) as a basis for a drug abuse diagnosis warranting monitoring. Workplace positive drug tests for a non-prescription controlled substance also guarantees a drug abuse diagnosis. VRP “voluntary” participants do not know this. You think you could get cleared……NOPE.
Once a licensee contacts the PNAP – specified drug and alcohol treatment provider, to be compliant, the expectation is to disclose current and historical drug and alcohol (D/A) use. Drug rehab assessors (not medical trained professionals) require VRP “voluntary” participants to release their medical records for review. The assessors use the records in their PNAP “report” to identify whether the licensee is truthful during an assessment. Now PNAP has your medical and prescription drug use history.
Some assessors may look past minor recreational use of marijuana or alcohol. However, PNAP and PHMP supervisors sometimes intervene and “reorganize” assessor’s non-impaired conclusions. By “reorganize” I mean PNAP caseworkers will either require the assessor to change their no-monitoring conclusion or require a second PNAP assessment. This the problem being voluntarily compliant with VRP assessments. You can’t trust the person performing the assessment. You can’t trust the PNAP or PHMP caseworker to not intervene in the assessment. Do not disclose your medical care or medication history in an environment lacking in trust or transparency.
2) Complete the Participation Cooperation Form and Personal Data Sheet
PNAP treats the Participation Cooperation Form as a voluntary enrollment contract. Right off the bat, PNAP attempts to enforce this contract as if it were the Nursing Board. It is not. For example, prior to or during the assessment process (waiting for scheduling, attending the assessment, or receipt of the report – which is always delayed due to receipt of medical records), PNAP may instruct VRP participants to not work. PNAP participation is voluntary and voluntary means compliance. PNAP initially tests a licensee’s ability to comply by precluding work. This not proper. Only a formal Board order precluding a licensee from practicing their profession impairs a license and their ability to work. If you need to work, and PNAP will not let you, consider not going into the VRP.Absent a formal Board Order PNAP and PHNP do not have any authority to compel licensees to comply with the VRP participation requirements. PHMP sometimes requires VRP enrollees to participate in an aftercare plan based upon the PHMP approved assessment. Or, only after attendance in the care plan can the licensee return to work. This wrong. Months could go by without working, expenses are rising, and licensees need to work.The VRP letter of concern states “failure to comply with the terms of the PHMP agreement will result in the initiation of formal disciplinary process against the license to practice.” PNAP and the PHMP cannot compel disciplinary action. PHMP and PNAP threats for failure to honor the terms of the PHMP participation agreement – compelling disciplinary action – absent a formal nursing board agreement is an empty threat. Only a Pennsylvania licensing board prosecutor can initiate disciplinary action. The PHMP and PNAP case workers cannot and do not initiate legal action.PHMP and PNAP do not have the authority to initiate disciplinary action. Only after a Pennsylvania professional licensing board enters a formal board order accepting a consent agreement – which is different from a PHMP agreement- can disciplinary action be initiated for breach of that order. Licensees are allowed to work this entire time. There is no Board order or other restriction on a licensee’s license during this time. This part of the PNAP trap.PNAP’s Participation Cooperation Form language is a threat scaring licensees to not change their mind. Licensees perceive the VRP assessment process will be quick. PNAP makes sure it is not. After signing the Participation Form, PNAP stops returning phone calls, answering questions, and SLOWS DOWN the process, causing licensees great frustration. Assessments are cancelled or reschedule for weeks. Licensees who are fully compliant, attend the assessments, provide medical records are treated improperly.PNAP caseworkers start the bait and switch lie tactics. PNAP caseworkers claim licensees can’t back out of the agreement, must comply and not work during the delay in report clearance or they’ll be subject to disciplinary process. PNAP case workers claim PHMP must release the licensee back to work. PHMP caseworkers claim it is the legal department or the report is not done yet, or another drug test is required. This not correct. Absent a formal Board Order, a VRP voluntary compliance participant who can change their mind. The threat of “legal review and prosecution” is just that; A threat – not reality.
3) Personal Data Sheet
Many licensees initially participate in the VRP as a result of receiving a Letter of Concern. The Letter of Concern is triggered by criminal charges – a single offense DUI, a public drunkenness – or falling asleep in a job after working too many hours. The personal data sheet seeks very private and confidential information. Filling out a personal data sheet provides PNAP and the PHMP very extensive, confidential, and private information. Many licensees candidly and honestly answer the personal data sheet questions.Some questions, however, should not be answered. Questions 22, 23, and 24(a)-(g) are of specific concern. When confronted with substance abuse questions 22-24, many licensees indicate they do not have a drug or alcohol use condition, have never been diagnosed with such, and are taking prescription medication. For the one/off DUI case, minor personal recreational use of pot or some mild alcohol use, the addiction questions can not be affirmatively answered.At first blush licensees seeking to be compliant with the VRP process do not answer these questions because they can not admit to an addiction and/or do not suffer from one. PNAP or PHMP case workers review the data sheet answers and claim the licensee did not provide proper complete information. The delay process begins. PNAP does not accept blank or denials to these addiction questions. PNAP tells licensees that their version of the truth makes them ineligible for the VRP and the matter can be referred to the prosecutor for review. SCARE SCARE SCARE.Licensee don’t want to be eligible for this program. Licensees should not lie on this form and admit an addiction to get into the VRP. Admissions of addiction form the basis for VRP participation and eventual professional licensing boards’ consent agreement compelling compliance in the program. Admission of an addiction, impairment, and inability to practice nursing is a necessary finding of any Board Order. It also stops the licensee from working.Do not admit possessing a medical condition (drug or alcohol addiction) you do not have. Make the Board prosecutor prove their case….. Do not admit any addiction. The answers to questions 22 through 24 give the PHMP and the Board prosecutors the foundation for the consent agreement. Don’t answer these questions if you are not impaired, do not suffer from an addiction, and have not been diagnosed as suffering from an addiction.
4) Personal Date Sheet Questions about Drug, Alcohol, or Mental Health Care
Questions 25-33 of the Personal Date Sheet focus on drug or alcohol treatment or mental health care. This private, confidential medical care received based a medical condition for which many licensees receive appropriate care. The VRP, PNAP, and the PHMP will utilize your own health care needs against the licensee as a reason to determine an impairment exists. This even though the care is for a diagnosed medical condition, for which licensees receive proper care, and treat with lawful dispensed prescriptions. Do not give PNAP any personal information about you, about your medical condition, about the medications you take. They’re only using it against you. Please call to discuss your case
Categories
- Blog
- Criminal Defense
- Drug Crimes
- Drunk Driving
- Dui
- Federal Crimes
- Firm News
- Injuries
- Medical Nursing
- OIG Exclusion
- Pennsylvania Criminal Law
- Philadelphia Criminal Justice Updates
- Professional License Application
- Professional License Issues
- Professional Misconduct
- Substance Abuse
- Uncategorized
- USMLE and ECFMG
Archives
- September 2026
- April 2026
- December 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
