Hark and Hark
  • Home
  • About
  • In the News
  • Our Recent Cases
  • Publications
  • Tv Videos
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • X Close
Select Page

USMLE — Irregular Behavior

by rhark | Nov 16, 2019 | Blog, Professional License Application, Professional License Issues

WOW — Only in this quasi-governmental agency can a United States medical student be accused of conduct, be determined to have committed “irregular behavior”, but not be permitted to see the evidence against them or cross examine the USMLE staff person who made the determination.  This is called a denial of DUE PROCESS.

I represent several clients accused of “Irregular Behavior” based upon the suggestion that they possessed “Live Content”.  Live content is any previous or current USMLE testing content.  USMLE defines Irregular Behavior as

  1. Irregular behavior includes all actions or attempted actions on the part of applicants, examinees, potential applicants, or others that could subvert the examination process. Examples of irregular behavior include, but are not limited to: failing to comply with any USMLE policy, procedure, and/or rule; seeking and/or obtaining unauthorized access to examination materials; providing false information; impersonating an examinee or having someone else test in one’s place; giving assistance to or receiving assistance from another individual in answering test items; possessing unauthorized items, equipment or materials during an examination; altering or misrepresenting examination scores; engaging in disruptive or unprofessional behavior at a test center; theft of examination materials; unauthorized reproduction by any means and/or dissemination of examination content or other copyrighted materials; posting or discussing examination content on any website, or asking others to do so; and taking any other action that could give an inappropriate advantage to individuals who might be taking the examination.

USMLE staff determine “Irregular Behavior” and assess whether there is sufficient evidence to conclude that irregular behavior may have occurred. However, the staff person that makes the conclusion is not identified and is not subject to any questioning by the testee before any committee meeting,  hearing, or appeal.

In my recent case, my client is accused of seeking and/or obtaining unauthorized access to examination materials.  However, the USMLE will not allow me to see the hand written study materials my client brought to the testing center.  The USMLE will not let me look at the materials to which my client’s notes are compared to determine the notes are prior USMLE content.  The case study preparation information is common place information contained in many study guides, medical school test preparation courses, and medical school text book.  It is an amazing allegation and responsibility to handle this case with such staggering repercussions.

This medical school students entire professional career is in question based upon the consequences of this accusation of Irregular Behavior.  The specific consequences are extreme, at a minimum requiring the student to explain this occurrence at every residency, rotation, and licensing application.

If the USMLE Committee for Individualized Review (“CIR”) determines that irregular behavior has occurred, an annotation to that effect will be entered in the USMLE record of the examinee, and this annotation will appear on applicable score reports (if scores are reported) and on transcripts for that examinee. Information regarding the decision of the CIR and the basis for such decision may also be provided to legitimately interested entities, including the Federation of State Medical Boards’ Physician Data

If the CIR determines, in its discretion, that an individual engaged in irregular behavior that is sufficiently serious to warrant such action, the individual may be barred from future administrations of USMLE or subjected to special procedures for taking future USMLE examinations, in addition to being subject to the actions described in Paragraph A.2, above

Please call to discuss your case.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Categories

  • Blog (15)
  • Criminal Defense (18)
  • Drug Crimes (16)
  • Dui (11)
  • Federal Crimes (7)
  • Firm News (287)
  • Injuries (2)
  • Medical Nursing (34)
  • Pennsylvania Criminal Law (19)
  • Philadelphia Criminal Justice Updates (8)
  • Professional License Application (20)
  • Professional License Issues (41)

Archives

  • November 2019 (3)
  • October 2019 (6)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • August 2019 (3)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • June 2019 (3)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (6)
  • March 2019 (4)
  • February 2019 (5)
  • January 2019 (7)
  • December 2018 (9)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (7)
  • September 2018 (5)
  • August 2018 (6)
  • July 2018 (3)
  • June 2018 (8)
  • May 2018 (5)
  • April 2018 (1)
  • March 2018 (2)
  • February 2018 (2)
  • January 2018 (4)
  • December 2017 (2)
  • November 2017 (5)
  • October 2017 (3)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • August 2017 (4)
  • July 2017 (3)
  • June 2017 (6)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (3)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • January 2017 (5)
  • November 2016 (3)
  • October 2016 (5)
  • September 2016 (2)
  • August 2016 (5)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (1)
  • April 2016 (2)
  • March 2016 (3)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (3)
  • October 2015 (2)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (3)
  • June 2015 (3)
  • May 2015 (2)
  • April 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (3)
  • February 2015 (1)
  • January 2015 (2)
  • December 2014 (1)
  • November 2014 (3)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (5)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (5)
  • March 2014 (2)
  • February 2014 (1)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (3)
  • November 2013 (5)
  • October 2013 (4)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (3)
  • May 2013 (5)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • February 2013 (1)
  • January 2013 (1)
  • December 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (1)
  • October 2012 (7)
  • September 2012 (2)
  • August 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • June 2012 (1)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • April 2012 (1)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (2)
  • September 2011 (1)
  • August 2011 (1)
  • June 2011 (2)
  • May 2011 (1)
  • April 2011 (2)
  • March 2011 (2)
  • February 2011 (1)
  • January 2011 (1)
  • December 2010 (3)
  • November 2010 (2)
  • October 2010 (1)
  • September 2010 (1)
  • August 2010 (3)

Recent Posts

  • USMLE — Irregular Behavior
  • Pennsylvania Teachers and Criminal Conduct – Mandatory Employment Termination
  • Find out if your doctor should be practicing
  • Can you lose your license for moral turpitude?
  • Professional license suspension due to moral turpitude

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

FindLaw

Ask About Your Options

Email Us For A Response
Map
Map
Map

Philadelphia Office

1835 Market Street, Suite 2626
Philadelphia, PA 19103

Toll Free: 877-442-7552
Phone: 215-665-0766
Fax: 215-665-1225

Philadelphia Law Office Map

King of Prussia Office

2000 Valley Forge Circle - Suite 107
King of Prussia, PA 19406

Toll Free: 877-442-7552

Map & Directions

Philadelphia Office

1101 Route 70 West
Cherry Hill, NJ 08002

Toll Free: 866-427-4552
Phone: 856-354-0050
Fax: 856-454-0440

Map & Directions

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2019 Hark and Hark. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters